Zu dieser Karteikarte gibt es einen kompletten Satz an Karteikarten. Kostenlos!
26
Zielinski v. PPI (notes)
Plaintiff sued Philly Piers (PPI) for injury on pier from forklift. Defendant made general allegation. Prob - PPI had transferred operation of pier to CCI, and this fact didn't surface til statute of limitations ran.
H - PPI estopped to deny that it ran the pier at the time of the injury both because its answer failed to alert P to the problem, and also b/c it could have denied more specifically. Ruled this way despite no finding of bad faith.
H - PPI estopped to deny that it ran the pier at the time of the injury both because its answer failed to alert P to the problem, and also b/c it could have denied more specifically. Ruled this way despite no finding of bad faith.
Tags: Answer
Quelle:
Quelle:
Karteninfo:
Autor: stgillian
Oberthema: Law
Thema: Civil Law
Schule / Uni: Tulane
Ort: New Orleans, LA
Veröffentlicht: 02.03.2010