This flashcard is just one of a free flashcard set. See all flashcards!
26
Zielinski v. PPI (notes)
Plaintiff sued Philly Piers (PPI) for injury on pier from forklift. Defendant made general allegation. Prob - PPI had transferred operation of pier to CCI, and this fact didn't surface til statute of limitations ran.
H - PPI estopped to deny that it ran the pier at the time of the injury both because its answer failed to alert P to the problem, and also b/c it could have denied more specifically. Ruled this way despite no finding of bad faith.
H - PPI estopped to deny that it ran the pier at the time of the injury both because its answer failed to alert P to the problem, and also b/c it could have denied more specifically. Ruled this way despite no finding of bad faith.
Tags: Answer
Source:
Source:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c64c7/c64c7f61abb9e2d96a6c69beff1bd79eb8bfc4e8" alt=""
Flashcard info:
Author: stgillian
Main topic: Law
Topic: Civil Law
School / Univ.: Tulane
City: New Orleans, LA
Published: 02.03.2010