Carey v. Piphus
Suspended for marijuana without hearing, claimed due process deprivation but no actual damages b/c would have been suspended anyway
H - Due process is an absolute right for which you can get only nominal damages ($1) in absence of other harm
Notes:
TRO is quicker, PI takes time
Rule 65, TRO and PI
H - Due process is an absolute right for which you can get only nominal damages ($1) in absence of other harm
Notes:
TRO is quicker, PI takes time
Rule 65, TRO and PI
Tags: PI, TRO
Quelle:
Quelle:
Smith v. Western Electric
Workplace non-smoker sought injunction to protect himself from smoke due to health probs.
H - P has a right to prove his case for an injunction, because if we can give an equitable remedy and prevent harm it's better than money damages after harm has occurred.
H - P has a right to prove his case for an injunction, because if we can give an equitable remedy and prevent harm it's better than money damages after harm has occurred.
Tags: PI, TRO
Quelle:
Quelle:
Kartensatzinfo:
Autor: stgillian
Oberthema: Law
Thema: Civil Law
Schule / Uni: Tulane
Ort: New Orleans, LA
Veröffentlicht: 02.03.2010
Schlagwörter Karten:
Alle Karten (94)
Amend (4)
Answer (4)
Attorney Fees (1)
Class Action (4)
Default (1)
Discovery (8)
Diversity Jdx (2)
Impleader (4)
Interpleader (1)
Intervention (8)
Jdx (12)
JNOV (3)
Joinder (5)
PI (2)
Pleading (19)
Real Parties (1)
Right to Jury (6)
Sanctions (4)
Specificity (11)
Summary Judgment (8)
Topics (2)
TRO (2)
