Jane enters onto Sam’s property to help someone in danger. If Sam charges Jane with trespass to land, Jane has
a. no defense.
b. a possible defense.
c. a partial defense.
d. a complete defense.
a. no defense.
b. a possible defense.
c. a partial defense.
d. a complete defense.
d. a complete defense.
Begründung:
Jane has a complete defense because she tried to protect somebody else - Necessity.
Begründung:
Jane has a complete defense because she tried to protect somebody else - Necessity.
Tags: Conversion - letzter Absatz
Quelle: p. 33
Quelle: p. 33
Kartensatzinfo:
Autor: Elisa
Oberthema: Law
Thema: International Law
Schule / Uni: Hanze Hogeschool
Ort: Groningen
Veröffentlicht: 14.02.2010
Tags: Exam Year 1
Schlagwörter Karten:
Alle Karten (125)
? (1)
2nd Absatz (2)
Business Trust (2)
Conversion (1)
Conversion - letzter Absatz (1)
Defamation (1)
Dissolution LP (1)
Distributorship (2)
Domestic (1)
First sentence (2)
Franchise (1)
Joint venture (2)
last sentence (1)
LLC (1)
Negligence (1)
Partnerships (1)
point 2 (1)
Preferred Stock (1)
Preferred stocks (1)
Self-defense (1)
Slander of Title (1)
Stocks (3)
Syndicate (2)
Trespass to Land (1)