Doug, a wholesale hardware salesperson, follows Erin, another wholesale hardware salesperson, as she contacts her customers. Doug solicits each of Erin’s customers. Doug is likely liable for
a. appropriation.
b. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
c. wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
d. none of the above.
a. appropriation.
b. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
c. wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
d. none of the above.
c. wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
Begründung:
Doug knew of the contact between Erin and her customers but he still solicits each of them.
Begründung:
Doug knew of the contact between Erin and her customers but he still solicits each of them.
Tags: Wrongful interfence with a contractual relationship
Quelle: p. 28
Quelle: p. 28
Kartensatzinfo:
Autor: Elisa
Oberthema: Law
Thema: International Law
Schule / Uni: Hanze Hogeschool
Ort: Groningen
Veröffentlicht: 14.02.2010
Tags: Exam Year 1
Schlagwörter Karten:
Alle Karten (125)
? (1)
2nd Absatz (2)
Business Trust (2)
Conversion (1)
Defamation (1)
Dissolution LP (1)
Distributorship (2)
Domestic (1)
First sentence (2)
Franchise (1)
Joint venture (2)
last sentence (1)
LLC (1)
Negligence (1)
Partnerships (1)
point 2 (1)
Preferred Stock (1)
Preferred stocks (1)
Self-defense (1)
Slander of Title (1)
Stocks (3)
Syndicate (2)
Trespass to Land (1)
Wrongful interfence with a contractual relationship (1)