Briefly define the following seven steps to successful Reflective listening:
1. Affirming contact
2. Paraphrasing
3. Clarifying implicit thoughts
4. Reflecting core feelings
5. Silence
6. Eye contact
7. One way versus two way communication
1. Affirming contact
2. Paraphrasing
3. Clarifying implicit thoughts
4. Reflecting core feelings
5. Silence
6. Eye contact
7. One way versus two way communication
1. "I see", "Uh-huh", "ok"
2. paraphrase their message occasionally
3. coax out their implicit message "What's troubling you?"
4. look past explicit and implicit and find out what feelings the speaker is conveying
5. can give time to sort out thoughts
6. moderate eye contact communicates openness
7. one-way is efficient by not accurate; two-way is accurate and good for problem solving
2. paraphrase their message occasionally
3. coax out their implicit message "What's troubling you?"
4. look past explicit and implicit and find out what feelings the speaker is conveying
5. can give time to sort out thoughts
6. moderate eye contact communicates openness
7. one-way is efficient by not accurate; two-way is accurate and good for problem solving
Mastenbroek invisioned Power Networks. What three types of relationships did he invision? Which focuses on a win-lose approach? Which is characterized by a lesser employee wanting more autonomy? In which does it suck to be the middle manager?
1. equal vs equal (win-lose)
2. high vs low (autonomy)
3. high vs middle vs low (sucks to be middle manager)
2. high vs low (autonomy)
3. high vs middle vs low (sucks to be middle manager)
Briefly define the five sources of Interpersonal power:
Reward
Coercive
Legitimate
Referent
Expert
Reward
Coercive
Legitimate
Referent
Expert
reward- power to reward a target
coercive- power to cause an unpleasant experience to target
legitimate- agent and target agree that agent has power to influence
referent- power b/c agent is charismatic and respectable
expert- power from expert knowledge over target
coercive- power to cause an unpleasant experience to target
legitimate- agent and target agree that agent has power to influence
referent- power b/c agent is charismatic and respectable
expert- power from expert knowledge over target
Briefly define the contingencies of power:
-substitutability
-centrality
-discretion
-visibility
-substitutability
-centrality
-discretion
-visibility
substitutability- the ability to be replaced
centrality- how important group's functioning is to the success of organization
discretion- the level of autonomy in your job (if high, they probably can't do your job)
visibility- the ability of your positive value to the company to be seen
centrality- how important group's functioning is to the success of organization
discretion- the level of autonomy in your job (if high, they probably can't do your job)
visibility- the ability of your positive value to the company to be seen
What is your anagram for the Influence tactics? What is each one?
Pin - Pressure
Ups - Upward appeals
Except - Exchange
Cock - Coalition
Issues - Ingratiation
Really - Rational persuasion
Inspire - Inspirational appeals
Cream - Consultation
In - Informational control
Sex - Silent authority
Instantly - Impression management
Pleased - Persuasion
Ups - Upward appeals
Except - Exchange
Cock - Coalition
Issues - Ingratiation
Really - Rational persuasion
Inspire - Inspirational appeals
Cream - Consultation
In - Informational control
Sex - Silent authority
Instantly - Impression management
Pleased - Persuasion
Flashcard set info:
Author: savhighsmith
Main topic: Information Management
Topic: Communication
School / Univ.: UGA
City: Athens
Published: 27.04.2011
Tags: Dr. Mitchell
Card tags:
All cards (77)
no tags